<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Forecasting</title>
	<atom:link href="http://surfpioneer.com/blog/forecasting/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://surfpioneer.com/blog/forecasting/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 06:48:52 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: bison</title>
		<link>http://surfpioneer.com/blog/forecasting/comment-page-1/#comment-202</link>
		<dc:creator>bison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 20:16:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://surfpioneer.com/blog/?p=187#comment-202</guid>
		<description>We’re just PNW surfers tired of relying on UK-based or corporate websites while having to check a multitude of sources to increase our chances of better waves.Our forecasts are simple. They lack the detailed data that some use to make surfing decisions

why not just use this then..?

http://www.oregonsurfcheck.com/

not uk based, more detailed...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We’re just PNW surfers tired of relying on UK-based or corporate websites while having to check a multitude of sources to increase our chances of better waves.Our forecasts are simple. They lack the detailed data that some use to make surfing decisions</p>
<p>why not just use this then..?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.oregonsurfcheck.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.oregonsurfcheck.com/</a></p>
<p>not uk based, more detailed&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
